We no longer live in a world of reality, but rather in a world of perception. Physics posited a multiverse with countless parallel dimensions, multiplying from each decision point. We, however, are now captive in a dimension with multiple realities all springing from the eye of the beholder. I began to observe this in my final years prior to retirement. Our Human Resources Department undertook a semi-annual training on the topic of sexual harassment. In the early years of this training, sexual harassment was defined by overt actions by an individual which were by consensus deemed to be crossing a line. If you did any or all of these actions, then you were guilty of sexual harassment. As the years passed, however, it was apparent that the definition of sexual harassment was changing. The issue of what you actually did became less significant than how you were perceived by an external observer. Sexual harassment became not what the Human Resources Department said it was, but rather what the victim said it was. If a male complements female 1 on her attire –“Hi Betty, you look nice today”, female 2 who overhears can become offended and legitimately claim sexual harassment. What was wrong with what was said to female 1? We won’t know until female 2 tells us. The reality of what has transpired is now irrelevant and is secondary to the perception of what has transpired. With the advance of technology, female 2 need not be present on the scene, but can instead be remotely viewing the scene well after the fact. By the time I retired, I was no longer comfortable pointing out to a female employee that she was in violation of the dress code because doing so could require me to overtly explain to her which articles were too revealing, too tight, or … Instead I would seek out a female coworker and ask her to assess the employee’s attire and speak to her if appropriate. Even that, though, by the end was insufficient insulation to prevent accusations. A female supervisor received a complaint about the attire of one of her subordinates. She called the employee in and suggested that her blouse was inappropriate and that the employee should either cover-up with a sweater or jacket, or go home and change. The employee pressed her with what was wrong with her blouse, and the she finally pointed out that the blouse was too tight, too sheer, and that her nipples were visible. The outcome of this was that the supervisor was accused of sexual harassment and, after studying the situation for several months, Human Resources concluded that that the supervisor should be admonished for having used the word “nipples”.

During my tenure with the court, there were two occasions wherein I was accused of racism. Both were investigated and I was thereafter absolved of any wrongdoing. I can’t help but wonder, however, how the same accusations would be treated in today’s climate. It should be noted that I am white, and my accusers were African-American. I recently dialoged with an African-American friend who, like me, worked for the superior court. She recounted several instances wherein white co-workers made racially ignorant and insensitive comments that betrayed that they either held innate prejudices or were influenced by generalized stereotypes. She concludes from these incidents that the organization was systemically racist, whereas I conclude that that the organization was systemically neutral, but with employees that at times behaved in a racist manner. The higher they were in the organization, the more they did to damage the organizations attempt at neutrality.

If you accept, as I do, that God created Man and that, as science agrees, we all have a common ancestry; then the concept of race becomes moot. In her book White Fragility, author Robin D’Angelo cites that there is no biological basis for race, but then turns around and makes skin color a determinant factor in society. Man is a discriminating creature. In establishing our own self-identity, we look for physical cues to differentiate ourselves from others and we take those cues to establish groupings. A tribe of pygmies might focus on height, a society of farmers might focus on attire. Differences in skin color have always been seized on by people as a point of differentiation. As soon as we find a point of differentiation, we start seeking patterns of behavior in our newly established groups, even though these different groups initially exist as constructs only in our own minds. We might conclude that people with big noses (meaning bigger than our own) are innately untrustworthy if we have a less than satisfying transaction with someone possessing a prominent proboscis. Having established a negative stereotype, it will take several positive interactions to overcome, if it can be overcome at all. As Shakespeare noted in Julius Caesar, “The evil that men do lives after them, the good is oft interred with their bones”. Our memory of negative experiences is stronger than our memory of positive experiences. Perhaps this is a survival trait that’s been reinforced over the eons, or perhaps it’s just a byproduct of original sin, which similarly cannot be overcome with good deeds. As a race (the human race), we are all creators of stereotypes. We use these as a shorthand for dealing with others whom we don’t know in initial interactions. But after that initial interaction, it is our obligation and duty to look beyond the simplistic narrowness of our own imaginations and get to know the heart of the person. Some of us are too lazy or too fixed in our prejudices to do this. Time is dealing with them now and God will deal with them later, just as there will necessarily be an accounting for media outlets that attempt to stoke division and animus in quest of clicks and views. President Barack Obama in his excellent A More Perfect Union speech eloquently commented on divisive statements his pastor had made, saying that “they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.”

We now see racialists trying to steal the progress that we have made and to demonize our founding fathers, imperfect humans that they were, and distort our history for political and financial gain. Even as they try to stoke a new civil war, let us remember the words of President Abraham Lincoln in his 2^nd Inaugural Address as the last civil war drew to a close: “With malice toward none with charity for all with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right let us strive on to finish the work we are in to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan ~ to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”

Those words are just as inspiring now as they were when spoken in 1865, however those who “have borne the battle” are today not those who donned a uniform, but rather those that have suffered as our nation has sought to better itself. It is important to remember that justice is not a destination, but rather a process.

As citizens in a democratic republic, our government knows the will of the people only through the votes that they cast. Accordingly, voting is a civic duty not to be taken lightly. There are three main steps you must take to fulfill this duty:

Registering to vote

Researching the issues and candidates

Casting your ballot

It is nice to imagine that after taking these steps that your vote will be counted and weighed in the outcome of the respective election. The key to fair elections is the concept of “One person, one vote”. However, the value and impact of any one vote is predicated upon the belief that the person voting is:

Eligible to cast a ballot

Has not voted previously or subsequently in the same election

Has completed and cast their own ballot

Every time a person fraudulently participates in an election, that person is negating the choice of a lawful voter. Every time a fraudulent ballot is discovered to have been cast, the confidence of the people in an honest outcome is diminished.

I confess that on occasion I have not voted in an election due to not having fully researched the issues and candidates. Having not taken the time to know the facts, I would have considered it inappropriate to cast a ballot and in so doing potentially ignorantly skew the outcome of the election.

Fundamental and tangential to the right to vote is the secret ballot. What and whom we vote for should be a matter for of our own conscience. We should not be subjected to criticism and possible repercussions for our views or beliefs. Though we often forfeit our anonymity by placing yard signs or contributing financial support to causes and candidates we believe in, that is a choice we make.

Unfortunately, a secret ballot invites the possibility of fraud. Let’s imagine that Candidate A and Candidate B are running for office in your district/community. You strongly support Candidate B and cast your vote accordingly. So long as the election results in your district/community show that at least one ballot was cast for Candidate B, then the election may have been fair. However, you may doubt the outcome if only one vote was counted for your candidate, though that one vote may well have been yours and perhaps you were the only person in your district/community that voted for Candidate B. So, to lend credibility to the election results, there are frequently poll watchers who observe the counting of the ballots. With partisan poll watchers, each representing opposing sides in the election, the counting process can usually be deemed to be fair.

However, ballots are rarely counted in real-time. In most circumstances, they are collected and taken to a central counting location. There is typically an audit between the number of people who signed-in to vote in a district/community and the number of ballots collected. However, this number need not be even if voters with absentee ballots have dropped-off their completed ballots at the polling location. An added complication is that these voters, though registered as absentee voters, are eligible to vote in person should they so choose. This suggests the possibility of double voting – one person, two or more votes. If you voted by mail, you additionally have to trust the U.S. Postal Service to have properly delivered your ballot to the Registrar of Voters in your county/district. It is not unheard of for mail to go undelivered by mail carriers through simple laziness. If you live in a postal ZIP code that trends toward one party or candidate, and your mail carrier favors the other candidate, it is not beyond the realm of belief to suspect that your mail-in ballot might not reach its destination, if you even received your mail-in ballot at all.

Now, having cast your ballot, you have to trust that your secret ballot, with no identifying marks to potentially void your anonymity, will be safely transported and counted. In the criminal justice system, there exists a chain of custody regarding evidence, meaning that you must be able to demonstrate where the evidence was gathered and the consistent chain of custody within the criminal justice system before that evidence is presented in court. Break that chain, and the evidence is out. So, in our electoral system, the physical ballot is the evidence, including any accompanying documentation in the case of absentee ballots. However, there is no chain of custody. By the time your ballot reaches the counting station, there is no proof that the ballot you cast is the ballot being counted. Similarly, there is no proof that the absentee ballot counted was cast by the voter to whom it was mailed. In truth, there is no proof that your ballot ever reached the counting station.

Hoping though that the process worked and the poll watchers have watched the handling of your ballot, you have to trust that it will be counted correctly. Typically, the paper ballots are fed into an electronic machine that tabulates the votes based on the marks on the ballot. The programming of these machines is done behind closed doors by persons not vetted by either party. Additionally, the machines may or may not be connected to the internet, opening the door for even more chicanery.

In our effort to make voting easier and more accessible, we have made it far more possible to perpetrate fraud. With easy voting comes a lessening in trust. I cast a ballot in the last election. I trust that the process worked as it should. Looking back, though, there were a number of documented anomalies that have caused reasonable people to question the result. Although this is a concern, history has shown us that if an election is stolen, it stays stolen.

I did have confidence, though in our voting system here in the State of California. However, my faith in our local electoral system was recently shaken. I recently received notice from the San Diego County Registrar of Voters that I am now registered to vote in San Diego County, though I live in Riverside County. Lest I be concerned about not receiving voting materials, they indicated that they would mail my voting materials for San Diego County to me in here in Riverside County. Proof of this, they also mailed me a mail-in ballot for a special election occurring in April in San Diego County.

I predictably called the San Diego County Registrar of Voters to enquire as to what triggered my registration in San Diego. The very courteous woman to whom I spoke (I love San Diego County public employees, having been one for more than 30 years) informed me that my registration had been changed by the California Department of Motor Vehicles. Looking at the timeline, I saw that it roughly coincided with the renewal of the registration on my car. Strangely, nowhere on the renewal was any address other than my address in Riverside, and I received my validated registration at my address in Riverside. Stranger still was that the address to which I had been registered in San Diego was not an address at which I had ever been licensed to drive or had registered a vehicle.

I confess that I was unwilling to invest the time required to contact the Department of Motor Vehicles. Their customer service is nowhere near that of San Diego County and, when you encounter a giant cauldron of stupid, it is best not to stir. Sadly, though, I will have to invest the time to re-register to vote in Riverside County. I have always been too trusting, and I will continue to hope that any votes I cast are counted. I am reminded, though, of the quote from that famous socialist leader Josef Stalin who is reputed to have said “He who votes decides nothing, he who counts the votes decides everything”.

Still, the Bible teaches us that the just shall live by faith.₁ As Christians, we should vote by faith as well. Not faith in an imperfect and irreparably bent earthly system, but faith that all is unfolding according to His plan. I find that reassuring and calming when I am anxious. I pray that you do, too.

₁Romans 1:17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

I miss libraries. Sprawling collections of books, organized by author or subject, all available for immediate perusal or for withdrawal for study in depth. I recall many times going to our city’s central library, not in quest of a particular title, but instead looking for something to read. Biography, history, how-to, fiction; it was all there. Wandering the stacks would take my mind from subject to subject – a favorite author, a personality from history, a myriad of thoughts, ideas, and skills were all there at my command. Sometimes I would sit there and read, though more often I would go home with as many books as I could carry on my bicycle.

When I was a boy, I was drawn to books on history and biography. Looking back, I note that I was drawn to biographies of military or political leaders, rather than inventors. I think this was because, when I read the biographies of leaders, they always seemed to possess some directionality. Their early lives often pointed to their later achievements as though there was some force of destiny or hand of God forging their paths. With inventors, though, it was usually a moment of inspiration – a point where an idea came to them that changed their lives and changed the world. Leaders seemed like stones in a stream. A current carried them forward while the forces of movement smoothed their rough edges, seemingly perfecting them for their destination. Inventors, though, typically did not experience and benefit from the forces of movement. They remained little people with big ideas. Henry Ford gave us the assembly line, yet he remained a bully and a rabid anti-Semite until his death. Thomas Edison gave us the light bulb, yet he remained an opportunist who would appropriate the work of others as his own and exploit it for financial gain.

Although I am rambling to an extent, I see a connection coming. In our world today, the greatest inventions consist of how information is gathered, stored, disseminated, and shared. We have organizations such as Alphabet, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, and others that now exert tremendous influence over our lives. Behind each of them are inventors who are now fabulously wealthy and powerful, but like inventors in the past, they have not been personally improved by the creative process. That is what can result in us having a base, little man now being the wealthiest person in the world and the final arbiter of what we should think and read. This man is now in charge of a virtual book-burning, while the leaders of the other technopolies collude and conspire with one another so as to speak with one voice. Virtual book burnings achieve the same result as the literal book burnings of the 1930’s, but without the telltale smoke.

Every tyranny inflicted in human history has needed a scapegoat. Some person or group to point to in justification of acts that would otherwise be unthinkable. Hitler blamed the communists and the Jews. If there was a problem in the world, it was ultimately their fault. It is widely accepted that Hitler was behind the Reichstag fire that effectively ended democratic government in Germany. Hitler, though, blamed his political opponents and, of course, the Jews. In the 1950’s, we were told of the Red Menace. Senator Joseph McCarthy warned of communists having infiltrated all of our institutions. He was thwarted in his tyrannical efforts by a non-compliant media. TV, radio, and print media exercised the freedom of the press afforded them by our Constitution and shed a harsh light on his efforts, driving him back into the shadows from which he came.

We are now seeing a parallel in our own time. The new scapegoat is white supremacy and racism.  Although I’ve heard and read about white supremacists, in my experience they have always been poor, white, and deeply flawed people who banded together to march or party. Ignorant and ignored, they merited no attention until they ran afoul of the criminal justice system.  These people were obviously racist, as they openly proclaimed their self-perceived superiority. Their numbers were declining, though, over time. We could reasonably look forward to a day when their beliefs died out owing to their own ignorance. Apparently, I was mistaken. Having recently read Robin D’Angelo’s White Fragility, I learned that racism is everywhere. It is systemic. Much like the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia identified “intellectuals” as anyone with eyeglasses (and then murdered them), you can tell racists today by the color of their skin. If you are white, you are racist. Comically, we have a government led largely by old, white people promoting this viewpoint. Apparently, it does truly take one to know one.

We recently had a riot in Washington, D.C. This came from a peaceful demonstration of people who had supported what was then the current president and who believed that through chicanery and electoral fraud that the election held this past November was effectively stolen. Not speaking to that topic, these demonstrators were largely white. This is not because they were racists or white supremacists, but because the media had largely accused the sitting president of being a racist. Their motivation in doing this was twofold – to suggest that anyone who supported him was also racist, and to disincentivize minorities who had experienced dramatic economic progress during his term from supporting him. Electoral victories are typically won on pocketbook issues, and the media knew that without their intervention this would be decided similarly. An extremely small subset of demonstrators “assaulted” the capitol. We are told that this was an armed insurrection by white supremacists. Downplayed in this is that the Capitol Police, some of whom were sympathetic to the demonstration, opened the doors and allowed many of the “insurrectionists” to enter. We are told that one officer was killed by the insurrectionists, having been beaten to death with a fire extinguisher. However, we know that this same officer was on the phone with family members after the “insurrection” and his autopsy showed no signs of blunt force trauma. Still, he was accorded something akin to a state funeral for his role in giving his life in defense of the capitol. Our government still suppresses his full autopsy report to this date. Looking back at our historical parallels with the past, we can be reminded of Horst Wessel, the famous Nazi martyr. This is not to suggest that anyone on either side of the issue holds views similar to the Nazis, however it should not be forgotten that the Nazis were socialists, and socialism has never ascended to power in a nation with free speech, a free media, and free elections. This should give us pause.

The next step, already underway, is to round-up the alleged insurrectionists from across the country for trials in Washington, D.C. The narrative will be that armed white supremacists supporting the former president staged an attempted coup. Reporting will be shaped and focused to support that storyline. How such a coup would have played out, since at the time the person they allegedly supported was the president, has never been and will never be explained.

However, the “insurrection” (Reichstag fire?) was and is being used as justification to strip even more freedoms away from the American people. Soon the commission assembled to study the events of the “insurrection” will release their findings. If we are looking for an informed, sober, and impartial review we should expect disappointment, since those on the commission were chosen for their biases, not for any impartiality. They know or were told what their findings will be and will focus on culling evidence to support their conclusions. Sadly, we will only be allowed to hear the government conclusion, and all we like sheep will be led astray. Indeed, many of us will bleat loudly and demand that our freedoms be stripped away from us for our own safety, insisting that the wolves in leadership protect us.  

With that, the American experiment will draw to a close. It has been noted that the United States does not appear in Biblical prophecy. With our nation being a superpower, this was baffling. It is less baffling, though, as we watch America squander its legacy and recede from prominence on the world stage. Our fifteen minutes of fame is nearly over.  

Clocks have been a hobby of mine for many years. Although I have expended time and energy to gain a modicum of skill in their service and repair, my efforts have been of limited result. My nephew once characterized my efforts as “killing clocks”. My shelves of clocks and parts sadly suggest that his assessment was not too far from the truth. Notwithstanding, I confess to a fascination with mechanical clocks. Did you know that the term “clock” should only be applied to those with a striking and/or chiming train? This is because our word “clock” derives from the German word “glock”, meaning “bell”. Those clocks that do not strike the hour should more appropriately be called timepieces. But I digress, and for the purpose at hand I beg your indulgence should I refer to both clocks and timepieces with the generic term “clock”.

Clocks, in their simplest form, simply tell time. They have only one train (mechanism), the going train, which is solely purposed to release the energy of the spring or weight in a measured fashion to move the hands in order to display the time. Usually this type of clock will consist of gears fashioned from wood or brass, a spring, or possibly a weight in lieu of a spring. The clock is triggered to motion by either winding a spring or lifting a weight. An additional complication often encountered in clocks is a striking train (mechanism) which, like the going train, is purposed to release the energy of its respective spring or weight in order to strike the time (most commonly on the hour and the half hour). Some clocks have a third chiming train (mechanism) which, like the going and striking trains, is solely purposed to release the energy of its respective string or weight in order to play a melody prior to the striking train giving its report. With each possessing similar gears and levers, and with some having greater complications in comparison to those from earlier eras, it would not be surprising if someone surveying these structures might see a relationship between them with a seeming evolution from the earlier clocks to the later.

Their error would come, though, if they tried to surmise a natural process to the changes they see. They could potentially write a book, examining the similarities between some and the dissimilarities between others. They might spend their lifetime searching for a transitional clock that possessed the gears and spring of a going train, but had developed additional gears as it progressed toward developing a striking train. They would study the environment necessary that possessed the necessary building blocks of clockworks and lecture on the implications.

Of course, this could only happen in a society where clocks were foreign and strange and no one possessed any knowledge of their origin. We would never do this, because we know that each clock was fashioned from human knowledge and skill. No speculation is necessary regarding their origin because we know the creator.

This occurred to me, perhaps spurred by my fondness for clocks, as I looked at the marvel implicit in both the microcosm and the macrocosm of the world around us. Scientists stroke their beards and posit theory upon theory as to origins and destinies. We frantically panic that somehow through our actions we have somehow upset the natural order and fret that its now imperative that we fix the world and restore order. All the while ignoring our own arrogance in believing that puny mankind could break the world and, even more arrogantly, has the knowledge to fix it.

As Christians, we enjoy the luxury and the simplicity of marveling at the stars, at the miracle of life existing and regenerating around us, all the while with our hearts and minds at ease. We needn’t trouble ourselves with origins or destinies because, as with clocks, we know the Creator.

An old movie I recently watched featured a scene where the two protagonists were fleeing a group of villainous ne’er-do-wells. They reached a point in their flight when they encountered a rickety rope bridge stretching across a vast chasm. Of course, this was their only means of escape so they reluctantly began a perilous journey across.

It occurred to me that, too often, we look upon our faith journeys in a similar fashion. The Bible tells us that the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing₁. So, to those who are perishing (lacking faith) our journey of faith appears very similar to the rickety rope bridge in our cinematic example. If it does not inspire trust in them, why does it affect us differently? The answer is simple. Those who are perishing are unaware of that truth, whereas the understanding of our untenable existence without Christ drives those of us with understanding onto the bridge out of a sense of desperation. As in the cinematic example, each footfall builds faith. As we progress, we find that we are no longer looking down, but are rather looking forward and up. I imagine it was a similar experience for the Children of Israel as they crossed the Red Sea. Their first steps were hesitant, tentative, fearful; but the understanding of the certain death that awaited them if they did not cross spurred them onward.

Some of us are at different points in our journey. We may be reluctantly extending a single toe, unsure if God’s promises will support us; others are journeying resolutely, gaining both confidence and speed with each step; while still others among us are frozen mid-span, unwilling to go forward or back. For those who are hesitating or frozen in fear, I would remind you to focus not on the journey, the bridge, the seabed; but rather to focus on the destination. For us, that destination is a personal relationship with a loving Savior who knows us more intimately than anyone in this world and forgives and accepts us. You won’t know that experience if you do not keep moving. Jesus is calling… DON’T LOOK DOWN!  

₁ 1 Corinthians 1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

I spent the better part of the day recently working on a music box. When I say “better part”, it is not because I spent the majority of the day so occupied, but rather that of those activities that filled my day, this was the comparatively better part. Musical movements are remarkably simple in principle. A winding key stores energy in a spring, a governor regulates the release of this energy to a rotating cylinder, and individual pins on the cylinder connect with individual tines of varying length on a comb, producing a melody. Simple, though a remarkable degree of precision is required in the functioning of each element to produce a pleasant melody, rather than an inharmonious cacophony. The movement that held my attention today, even prior to my efforts, played beautifully… with the exception of one discordant note.

Now, it would have been easy enough to ignore since the problematic note occurred only once during the rendering of two very pleasant melodies, but it was a flaw that could be corrected. As I worked on the box, it occurred to me how remiss we often are in rectifying the discordant notes in our own lives. As Christians, we can so easily make allowances for our shortcomings with a dismissive “God isn’t done with me yet” or “His strength is made perfect in my weaknesses”. These statements, true though they are, often allow us to excuse us from making any effort to rectify those flaws which are well within our ability to address. Personally, I have difficulty with relationships. There are people in my life whom I dearly love, but I defer to them to do the work of maintaining open lines of communication. I expect that they understand it is hard for me and in so understanding they are obligated to reach out and connect. As in a musical movement, I am expecting them to twist the winding key and inject energy into the relationship. As I wait for them, the relationship languishes motionless and silent.

With my fondness for things mechanical, I have repeatedly explained (lectured?) to my family that the worst thing you can do to any mechanism is not to use it. That musical movement that plays so beautifully may struggle to overcome the inertia if left unused for months or years. How sad that I did not grasp that the same truth exists in the mechanics of relationships. Years ago a friend with whom I shared a mutual enthusiasm for vintage radios showed me his collection. High shelves lined almost every room of his home with an amazing collection of radios from the 1920’s and ‘30’s. Each one had been carefully restored and gleamed in polished cabinets with exotic inlays and intricate designs. He proudly told me that every one of them played. However, the truth was that every one of them played at the time it was placed on the shelf. He had a collection of fully restored radios, but he could only make that claim if he was careful never to plug them in again and test them.  He had an incredible collection of radios, but possessed none that he could listen to and enjoy, as any attempt to do so would shatter his illusion.

So, as with musical movements and radios, relationships do not sit static while you live your life. Each relationship strikes a certain note in your heart and to ignore them is to sentence yourself to a silent and lonely life. God has set the tune, and I am going to work to restore and repair the missing and discordant notes of the song that is my life.

I was struck by a recent study in the Book of Daniel wherein God demonstrated his power over the kingdoms of the earth. As we in the United States are presented with a presidential election, it is striking that in this moment we are not faced with a selection among the best and the brightest, but rather two men who their respective parties have deemed electable. The most successful (meaning electable) politicians in our society are often those that are most willing to compromise every moral and ethical principal in pursuit of power. Their parties assessment of electability means that they are deemed not to be the best person, but rather the best able to sway a sufficient number of the 56% of our voting age population who are expected to vote and who are residing in the appropriate locations to enable them to win the election. But in the current race strangely, and sadly, each candidate is campaigning for the other. One candidate’s message is “Vote for me! I’m less repugnant than the other guy!”; while the message of the other is “Vote for me! I don’t have dementia!”. Every time either of these men take the stage, they drive voters to their opposite, either by their overt repugnancy or their apparent cognitive decline. Who will win? Well, the repugnant candidate doesn’t listen to his handlers, so he won’t step back from the stage. His opponent hasn’t the capacity to ignore his handlers, so he is largely being hidden from public view. However, his absence testifies to his decline.

The Soviet tyrant Joseph Stalin is reputed to have said “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything”. In secular society, that thought rings true because of the conviction that the affairs of mankind are decided by mankind. However, those who know God know it to be false. Daniel 4:17 recounts the revelation from God to King Nebuchadnezzar “This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men”. It reasserts God’s authority as stated in Daniel 2:21 “And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding:” In our present day we should do well to remember that God is Sovereign over all nations. A proof of this will come for us in less than two weeks as God sets up over us “the basest of men”.  I won’t speculate as to who will win. But I know that there is only one vote that counts, and His has already been cast is not dependent on the U.S. Postal Service for delivery. His will be done. Hallelujah!

I was already old when He called me. Too old, my wife Zipporah said; but you don’t say “no” to God – or at least you don’t finish with “no”. Now, Egypt was but a faint echo. Zipporah more distant, more remote. I brought the people out to this barren place. For forty years I prayed for deliverance, for forgiveness… but God’s “no” possesses a firmness I could not muster those many years ago. I would not cross over.

I started this trek early, before the dew and while the stars still clung to the sky. Standing on the mountain, I looked out over the valley. The hot wind off of the desert chafed on my skin, heated by the mid-morning sun. Soon the day’s fiery heat would bear down on me with a fierce blast. Once more into the furnace to fire away the abandonment, disappointment, and resentment that each passing day stoked within me. I strained to catch a note in the air. Perhaps a fragrance, the mere hint of a land, long promised, but denied to me. I was rewarded only with dry, lifeless, dust; dust that would soon claim me as its own.

I imagine the foregoing as how Moses must have felt at the end of his life. We think of a long life as a blessing, but it may not seem as such to someone who has spent so many of those years waiting. My mother, throughout my childhood, waited expectantly for the rapture and read a library of books identifying the Antichrist. Spoiler alert: It wasn’t King Juan Carlos of Spain. So it is now, with many Christians convinced that we are in the last days. However, every generation since the resurrection has been convinced that Jesus’ return was imminent. And it was imminent. And it is imminent. My mother, who died of cancer several years ago, has seen it. My father-in-law and mother-in-law, both having passed from this world, have seen it. Moses experienced the promised land, and his eyes are still not dimmed₁. Such is God’s timing. All things will be fulfilled, and all things have been fulfilled.

₁ Deuteronomy 34:7 And Moses was an hundred and twenty years old when he died: his eye was not dim, nor his natural force abated.

I’ve always been fascinated with time, and more specifically, the concept of time travel.  That we live our lives, free to move within the first three dimensions of space, but are held captive in the fourth dimension of time, seems so frustrating. God is proof that movement is possible in the fourth dimension, for how else could He reveal to the prophets the secrets of the future. How could He write the Book of Life prior to most if not all of those listed having been born? So often we acknowledge that He is everywhere, but forget that He is every time as well. We are promised eternal life, but we are limited by the constraints of this world to imagine what that looks like. Eternal life heretofore has meant to me that we won’t die. Even that miracle, though, had limited appeal to me if it meant being captive in time and trudging onward from one moment to the next without end. They say that a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step, but mercifully it ends with a single step as well. A Far Side mug I once had featured an angel sitting on a cloud with a harp, commenting to himself that he wished he had brought a magazine. Eternity can be a long time without a purpose – like living the children’s song Michael Finnegan, constantly having to begin again.

I’m coming to understand, though, that eternal life does not mean life without end, experiencing it moment after moment for eternity. No, I believe it means a life not only without end, but without imprisonment in the moment. I’ve often imagined the time tracks of our lives as a river, each of us floating at a constant rate. When we approach milestones in our lives, the ultra-sensitive among us can sometimes sense their impending approach by the small circular ripples they create with their splash. Historic moments that shock or traumatize an entire culture or nation create greater splashes with stronger ripples circling out from their epicenter. Eternal life means no longer bobbing down the river, but being able to stand on the riverbank; being able to experience the river without getting wet. Even as memory fades of some events and people from my past, I am confident that I will someday be able to see them all clearly once again without embarrassment or shame. Solomon tells us that to every thing there is a season₁ and seeks to explain the nature of time when he writes “that which hath been is now; and that which is to be hath already been”₂.

Life holds so much promise – God’s promise of eternal life is so much greater. Not only life, but purpose. More than we can imagine, until we come into that promise and then we fully understand.

1 Ecclesiastes 3:1 To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:

₂ Ecclesiastes 3:15 That which hath been is now; and that which is to be hath already been; and God requireth that which is past.

We live in peculiar times. I watched an online service yesterday from a church that I sporadically attended pre-Covid and was struck by what the government has done. I would have said “our” government, but how long has it been since anyone could claim a stake in the system in charge? We used to brag about having a “government by consent of the governed”; but the curtain was pulled back on that fraud with the Civil War. So long as the governed consent, well and good. Changing your mind, though, was not an option. Change your mind, and the full weight of the federal government will be mobilized and brought to bear to kill you and your families until you cry “Uncle!” In this case, Uncle Sam. Some of us, though, still clung to the illusion. The illusion that even though our states were emasculated, we still had individual rights – rights guaranteed by the constitution. Note again that I did not say “our” Constitution, as none of us living had any voice in its contents. Perhaps it would be better if every generation we revisited it once more and ratified it once again? No matter. Enshrined in the Constitution are certain rights that we possess as individuals. We have been given to think of them as “unalienable” based on the wording of the Declaration of Independence, but that document is but a sentimental memento of our distant past possessing no force of law.
The first amendment of the Bill of Rights as enshrined in our Constitution states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Although the text specifically refers to “Congress”, the 14th Amendment is interpreted to make all the provisions of the Federal Constitution applicable and superior to any state constitutions. So, when we read that, we conclude that we are may worship freely without interference from government. Who would defend these rights? Why the courts, of course. So, when governors of various states declared an emergency and said that unessential businesses must close, there was a predictable reaction from some corners when churches were classified as unessential, especially when liquor stores selling alcohol and lottery tickets were deemed essential. You could gather to buy vodka, but not to praise God. This issue was taken all the way to the Supreme Court where, sadly, the alienation from our unalienable rights was affirmed. So apparently any of our rights can be taken away if the government declares an emergency and the courts look the other way. With the simplicity of a child saying “Simon says…” we can have all of our freedoms taken away as simply as declaring an emergency. Some governors have learned and embraced this and are now declaring emergencies regarding other subjects, such as racism. As they explore the rights they can suspend in this context, any defenders of free speech, freedom to assemble, and freedom of the press must be concerned. Surely, though, an emergency would have to be of limited duration without legislative action being necessary… No. It lasts as long as the government says it does. So, we now have governors in many states regulating churches – how they may open, how many may gather, and the form the worship service must take. Unthinkable a year ago, but now accepted by supposed ministers of God. This is how I came to watch an online service yesterday. The pastor was singing by himself in an empty auditorium (I would have formerly said “sanctuary”, but it no longer fits that definition). The off-key vocalizing was followed by a message delivered with passion in an empty room. Not a sermon on the mount, but a sermon on a molehill. No miracle of loaves and fishes required, a couple slices of bread and some tuna fish will be sufficient for those attending.
I had to wonder why he bothered? But then I considered the salaries of staff and overhead for the facilities. This corporate Christianity, this ecclesiastical exercise was being performed in the hope of keeping the contributions coming but, like the music, it struck a sour note. It was being performed by leaders who had greater faith in government than faith in God. A pastor I once knew posed the question to his class as to why there was greater healing at work in third world countries than in western nations. His conclusion was that they had a necessary greater reliance on God. He noted that in western nations we have health insurance, but in third world countries they had only blessed assurance. It left me to wonder where our mighty men of God are today? Are they laboring only in foreign lands? In our nation, how does one serve God, if they first bow their knee to government? How can you reconcile the surrender when people in other countries risk death and imprisonment to gather, but you are afraid of a virus and you do not trust God’s will in the matter? You cannot stand up for your faith if you have bowed down to unbelievers. It is only a matter of time before the government indirectly supports a new translation of the bible that is racially and gender sensitive. Don’t be surprised if a voluntary surrender of offending texts is sponsored soon in a neighborhood near you. After all, it’s an emergency.